Which genotype file formats work
Which genotype file formats CacaoIQ accepts and how marker positions are read.
Check a file from your genotyping lab against this page before you upload it.
Supported formats
| Format | What a call looks like | Missing call | Layout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Two-letter genotypes | AA, AC |
blank, --, NN, 00, ??, N, -, ., NA |
One sample per row or one marker per row (see below) |
| Separated letter genotypes | A/G, A|G, A:G, A G |
blank, NA, ./., N/N |
One sample per row or one marker per row |
| 0/1/2 allele-dose table | 0, 1, 2 |
-1, NA, ., blank |
One sample per row or one marker per row |
| HapMap | Standard HapMap | As in the HapMap standard | Fixed HapMap layout |
| VCF | Standard VCF genotype field | As in the VCF standard | Fixed VCF layout |
A 0/1/2 dose table is the usual output of DArTseq and GBS pipelines and of genomic-prediction workflows. All of these are converted automatically at upload. Sample IDs can be plain numbers, with or without leading zeros.
File types
- Supported: CSV and tab-delimited text (
.txt). - VCF: plain-text VCF only. Biallelic single-base SNPs are read; multi-allelic and indel records are skipped.
- Not supported: compressed VCF (
.vcf.gz) and the file formats of command-line association-analysis tools. Unzip a.vcf.gzfile before you upload it, or export a VCF or a 0/1/2 table from your pipeline.
Samples in rows or in columns
A letter table or a 0/1/2 table can have one sample per row (first column the sample ID) or one marker per row (first column the marker name). CacaoIQ works out which, mainly from the names:
- The side whose names match the tree IDs in your phenotype file holds the samples.
- Otherwise, the side with marker-style names (for example
chr1:9786,Tcm001s00113890,SNP_12, DArTseq CloneIDs) holds the markers. - Otherwise, the first header cell decides:
Marker,SNP,LocusorCloneIDmeans one marker per row;Sample,Tree,Clone,AccessionorGenotype_IDmeans one sample per row. - If the names don’t settle it, the shape of the file decides.
The file check at upload says how the file was read and why. When only the shape decided, it starts with “Couldn’t tell the layout from the names…”. Check the sample and marker counts on that line. If they look swapped, rename the first column’s header to Sample (one sample per row) or Marker (one marker per row) and upload the file again. Every run reads the file the way the upload check showed.
Marker positions
Where CacaoIQ finds a marker’s chromosome and position depends on the format. Chromosomes 1 to 10 are recognized.
| Format | Position read from | How to write the chromosome |
|---|---|---|
| VCF | The CHROM and POS columns |
A number from 1 to 10, bare or with a chr, chrom, tcm, cacao or scaffold prefix, in any case: 1, chr01, Chr_1. Other names, such as Tc01, are not recognized |
| HapMap | The chrom and pos columns (3rd and 4th columns) |
A plain number from 1 to 10. Write 1, not chr1: a marker written chr1 ends up unplaced |
| Letter and 0/1/2 tables | The marker name | Tcm001s00113890, chr1:9786, chr1:9786:SG, Chr01_9786 or 1:9786 |
A few details:
- In a VCF, the
IDcolumn is not used for the position. It only names a marker that has no position. - In a VCF,
scaffold_3is placed on chromosome 3 only whenPOSfits within the length of chromosome 3 of the Matina 1-6 reference genome. - In a HapMap file,
poscan be in base pairs or in megabases. Megabases are assumed when most values have decimals. - In a letter or dose table, a
scaffold_3:1200name is placed on chromosome 3 only when that scaffold’s markers span a chromosome-sized stretch.
The file check at upload shows how many markers have a chromosome position.
Positions must be on the Matina 1-6 reference
Marker positions must be on the Matina 1-6 reference genome for the candidate-gene search to be correct. CacaoIQ uses positions as given. It doesn’t detect which assembly they come from and doesn’t convert them.
Positions from another assembly can point the candidate-gene search at the wrong genes. When a gene window falls past the end of a Matina 1-6 chromosome, the results page shows a coordinate warning. Positions that fall within the chromosome lengths give no warning, so check the reference with your genotyping lab before you upload.
GWAS, the relationship matrix and the diversity analyses work with any coordinate system. The linkage map uses the marker order as given.
Markers with no position
A marker is unplaced when its chromosome isn’t recognized or it has no position. Unplaced markers are still used for the relationship matrix, the PCA and the tree, and are still tested in the GWAS. They are left off the Manhattan plot, and the results say how many: “
Which allele is counted
Every genotype becomes a 0/1/2 dose that counts copies of the marker’s more common (major) allele in your file. A 0/1/2 file is recounted the same way, so a 2 in your file may not be a 2 in CacaoIQ. In the GWAS table, effect_per_major_allele is the change in the trait per extra copy of that allele: positive means the major allele goes with higher values. The README in each results folder says this too.
Quality control applied to every file
These defaults can be changed in the run panel’s Genotype QC row (Reset to defaults restores them):
| Check | Default |
|---|---|
| Marker call rate | Markers called in fewer than 90% of trees are dropped |
| Minor-allele frequency | Markers with a rare allele below 5% are dropped; markers with one allele only are always dropped |
| Non-biallelic markers | Dropped |
| Tree call rate | Trees called at fewer than 90% of the well-called markers are dropped |
| Possible duplicates | Listed for you to check, not removed |
Sequencing-based data (GBS, DArTseq) often have more missing calls. When more than 10% of trees fail the tree call rate, the results say so and suggest trying 80%. The decision is yours.
When your genotype file carries DArTseq CloneIDs, CacaoIQ uses them to group SNPs from the same sequencing tag for the linkage map and QTL scan. GWAS and the relationship matrix still use every SNP.
No imputation is needed. Missing calls are handled by each analysis.
Common issues
- Few phenotype trees matched to genotypes: see Fix: tree IDs don’t match between phenotype and genotype files.
- Sample and marker counts look swapped: see Samples in rows or in columns.
- Many markers missing from the Manhattan plot: see Marker positions and Markers with no position.
- Candidate genes look unrelated to the trait: see Positions must be on the Matina 1-6 reference.
- Parents of an F1 cross not detected on GBS or DArTseq data: see Known issue: parent detection on GBS data.
Related articles
Still stuck? Write to support@scilytics.ai with your system and what you see on screen. Don’t attach data files. The first reply comes within 2 business days.